| Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S.A. v. Rogers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued May 1, 1958 Decided June 16, 1958 |
||||||
| Full case name | Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S.A. v. Rogers, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, et al. | |||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Harlan | |||||
| Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | ||||||
Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S.A. v. Rogers, 357 U.S. 197 (1958), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court considered whether a district court could dismiss a case based on the petitioner's failure to comply with the court's order to produce records of the petitioner's Swiss Bank account, an act which would have amounted to a violation of Swiss law.